Language as human knowledge system

Language is a human capacity (or faculty, or ability, or quality). The thesis expressed here is that human language (so-called natural language) acts as a repository of knowledge. What is the use of storing and manipulating knowledge? Primarily, to collectively solve problems that arise in the real world. Does language support this problem-solving? Yes, because language contains constructs that closely mimic the way reality is perceived (by humans) to work. For example:

Verbs

  • Verbs represent processes that are carried out in reality
  • Verb tenses represent our perception of time and the relative position of events on the time axis

Prepositions

  • Prepositions allow facts to be structured and ordered in time/space

Nouns

  • Nouns represent distinguishable entities in the real word (or in speculative worlds given the other human faculty of creativity)
  • New nouns and verbs are continuously emerging to represent new entities and processes with which humans deal
  • In contrast to the previous point, little or no new prepositions have emerged, because the fabric of space/time has been stable throughout human history - as far as we could tell.

Limits of reality and their effect on language

  • What happens if time travel becomes possible? New combinations of time sequences will be required that cannot be expressed with existing tenses. Check out this little discussion for speculations.
  • The quantum reality introduces its share of new questions about verb tenses. In fact, Quantum Linguistics is an emerging buzzword. Check out this short article.
  • What happens if human-scale quantum effects become commonplace? Objects will no longer have local positions in space, so new prepositions will be needed.

Language as representation of thought

Language thus creates a logical model of physical reality and allows to populate that model with facts, i.e. observations, as well as communicate those facts, and the model itself, to other humans. By a process of creative analogy, humans also use language to describe intangible concepts and beliefs, and they structure those pseudo-facts in the same framework as the physically-motivated model. In this sense, human thoughts are embodied in language. To be sure, the phonetic aspect of language contains very rich semantic information at an even higher level: speech intonation carries complete emotions among individuals.

So to study language is to study thought. To model language is to model thought.

Sapir-Whorf... not so fast.

Very interesting. I can imagine that "language influences thought" but not "language determines thought", this is simplistic and makes the language the only parameter which determines thought. This, In my opinion, is not true. Other parameters (social, economic and political context, beliefs, education etc.) are much more decisive.

In the reply by Daniel Lemire (first comment to the article http://apperceptual.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/sapir-whorf-hypothesis/), he makes a comparative analysis between english and french. I don't think we can make much conclusions by comparing two "neighbour" (too close) languages. The article would have been much more interesting if he tried to compare other languages (Arabic or Mandarin vs English for exemple).

Thank you for the links :)

I don't agree either that

I don't agree either that "language determines thought". But I must admit that I get confused about the relationship between them. For example: it's difficult to think of something that we don't name. Naming, i.e. assigning a symbol to a pattern, is an essential skill to build knowledge and thus to survive. Take a look at the semiotic triangle that visualizes nicely this relationship.

As for the evolution of languages, this is an historical issue that I am not attempting to discuss here. I am more interested in the ontological aspect, which prompted this post.

Interesting... What about

Interesting... What about the diversity of languages. Every language has its particularities (particular grammar, particular sounds and particular history/evolution). So, if a person knows multiple languages this will increase its capacity of expression (and even its tought - like you said: "human thoughts are embodied in language").

How the diversity of

How the diversity of languages affects thought is still unsolved. Check out this discussion for an idea of what's currently being said.